With our brilliant politicians and bureaucrats, what’s remote today might become a subsidized competitive environment tomorrow. I’d have more respect for a politician who simply says that he has to repay his biggest contributors who lined his pockets during election time than to use the poor as an excuse.
Airbeam ubiquiti free#
“ If you are going to use taxpayer money, $300,000,000 of it for example and give it to the 5 biggest cellular/ISPs in the country to help them wipe out small, innovative competitors in the free market system, at least be honest with the public. Even worse, they couch it in terms of “helping the poor. However, throw in politicians who still haven’t figured out that stealing money from taxpayers and giving it to their big donors is reprehensible. The typical areas that still don’t have coverage are not the small pockets of dense housing areas but simply areas that are remote, where houses are few and far between. I’m not counting the first generation satellite systems since they could get everywhere, but were very limited in capacity. In two other countries I’m dealing with, both models are valid and I’m looking at hybrid models in each of them.Īs recently as 3 years ago, I saw areas with hundreds or thousands of users that still couldn’t get any high-speed wired or cellular-based broadband. As the United States is only 20% of the worldwide wireless ISP (WISP) market, I’m not going to presume that my analysis applies everywhere. As Open-Range, Key-On, and several other recent failures have demonstrated, that type of model is more difficult to design and deploy successfully (read profitably) in today’s competitive environment in the United States. However, today attempts to improve upon the model range from a friend who wants to cover his neighborhood to companies that are looking at going public down the road. In the beginning of our industry, that was pretty much the model that stands proven and true today. Many of you have done that successfully for several years. Designing a WISP with a tower-centric model is pretty straight forward. However, I also wanted this article to be factually accurate and gave both manufacturers a couple of days to respond to any inaccuracies.
I have my opinions and perceptions as many of you do. Before you start reading this article, let me warn you first that it is longest one I’ve written and the only one in which the manufacturers I talk about see the text before publication.